Is RabbitMQ better than ActiveMQ?
Is RabbitMQ better than ActiveMQ?
RabbitMQ is the best performance wise according to me, but it does not have failover and recovery options. ActiveMQ has the most features, but is slower. Update : HornetQ is also an option you can look into, it is JMS Complaint, a better option than ActiveMQ if you are looking for a JMS based solution.
What is better than RabbitMQ?
Apache Kafka: Kafka offers much higher performance than message brokers like RabbitMQ. It uses sequential disk I/O to boost performance, making it a suitable option for implementing queues. It can achieve high throughput (millions of messages per second) with limited resources, a necessity for big data use cases.
Which is faster Kafka or RabbitMQ?
RabbitMQ queues are faster only when they’re empty, unlike Kafka that can retain lots of data with minimal overhead. Kafka is capable of processing millions of messages in a second. Though RabbitMQ can also process millions of messages in a second, it would require more resources to do so.
Is RabbitMQ a message broker?
RabbitMQ is a messaging broker – an intermediary for messaging. It gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
Should I use Redis or RabbitMQ?
Redis is an open-source in-memory data source which can function as a message-broker, database, and a cache….Comparison Table of RabbitMQ vs Redis.
RabbitMQ | Redis |
---|---|
RabbitMQ handles large messages way better than Redis. | It is better suited for smaller messages. The latency is very high for larger messages (>1 MB) |
What is the difference between RabbitMQ and MQTT?
MQTT is designed to be used for smaller devices that send messages over a network with low bandwidth. It is well-known for its simplicity (Only 5 Apis) and minimal wire footprint. On the other hand, RabbitMQ has been designed to be used for a variety of messaging scenarios that have developed over the last 25 years.